|
Swedish
housing research has disproportionately concentrated on the study
of appartment blocks and on how to create functioning neighbourhoods
and neighbourliness, as part of a national housing policy that aimed
at building apartment blocks for ordinary families. Yet at the same
time, most Swedish families with children have been choosing to
live in an owner occupied house. How can this paradox be explained?
The starting point of Swedish housing policy - and therefore for
Swedish
housing research - has consequently been to foster equality and
social justice
in and through housing and town planning. In part this has aimed
at providing better housing for working class people. But it has
also aimed at easing the burden of work in the home, and it has
done so by providing rationally planned housing and neighbourhoods,
as well as well-developed public transport and other collective
facilities. Alva Myrdal was a leading light in working for gender
equility and has been an important source of inspiration for this
approach to housing and town planning. Yet at the same time as this
focus on equality was being persued there were also strong currents
favouring an approach that built
on the strenghts of gender differences an in particularly a view
of women as housewives and home-oriented experts.
Yet why have so many families taken the opportunity and chosen to
move to an owner occupied house? In order to explain this, the positivistic
tradition of housing research is indaquate. It is necessary to turn
to hermeneutic tradition of research on meaning and significance
of housing in an social and cultural context to look for answers.
The social and cultural context can in turn be related to developments
and issues in modernity. I argue that the continuing appeal of the
owner occupied house even when most women are in paid employment
needs to be understood against a background of increasing intimisation.
This in turn can be seen as a reaction against the built-in tendency
towards the development of indvidualisation. When people become
increasingly home-oriented and inward-looking, the home as part
of their lives increases in significance. The home in our time has
become a free zone and a love project and so the owner occupied
house appears to provide a better type of housing than an apartment
in a multi-family building. This goes for men as well as women,
despite the risk that traditional gender roles in the household
can thereby be strengthened.
|